In speech comprehension, listeners attend to variation in multiple acoustic parameters encoding prosodic structure. Given the multiplicity of acoustic cues, we ask whether prosody perception is dependent on any individual cue or whether acoustic redundancy encoding prosody supports robust prosody perception in the absence of an individual cue. The present paper reports on a study of boundary perception in spontaneous speech with and without silent pause as a boundary cue. Prior studies show that in read speech, silent pause is important for boundary perception, while in spontaneous speech, listeners can detect boundaries without pauses. Our study tests the role of pause in boundary perception with two versions of 36 short speech excerpts from the Buckeye Corpus: one with pauses intact and another with all pauses truncated to 20 ms. In real-time transcription tasks based only on auditory impression, boundary locations were marked by 74 subjects for the intact stimuli and by an additional 15 subjects for truncated excerpts. Inter-transcriber agreement was comparable across the intact and truncated conditions. Paired-sample t-tests show significantly higher rates of boundary perception for intact stimuli indicating that silent pause is an important but not necessary cue to boundary perception and cue redundancy allows for robust perception.