
doi: 10.1121/1.2935897
This paper is an attempt to compare two interferometric processings. The first one is applied to traditional space-borne radar (SAR) and the second on recent interferometric sonar data. Few comparisons between those tech-niques have already been made, despite the fact that they share many similar principles, only a. Thus, the key idea of this article is to present both techniques with assets, drawbacks and specific “tricks” used in dataprocessing. The first part introduces briefly both sensors and compares signal and processing techniques used for both of them. The second part deals with interferometry, and more precisely with underwater and satellite interferometry. Then a noise-pollution analysis is performed on both techniques followed by bias removal methods for getting interferometric information. The conclusion summarizes the similarities between sonar and radar processing, pointing at the techniques that can applied to both.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
