
doi: 10.1121/1.2016048
This research was designed to substantiate the results of Ohala [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, S44(A) (1976)] which supported the “tongue-pull” hypothesis of intrinsic vowel pitch. Our goal was explanation of the observation that vowels with high tongue position have higher F0 than do vowels with low tongue position. It has been suggested that the anatomical interactions between tongue larynx put an added stress on that structure when the tongue is in an elevated position, thus raising F0 for the vowel. We replicated Ohala's use of bite blocks to force the speaker to produce articulatory “supershapes.” If the tongue-pull hypothesis is correct. a given vowel would have higher F0 with the jaw blocked in an unnaturally open position than with the jaw free. This was the case with Ohala's results, However, in our preliminary work with three subjects we have not been able to substantiate those results. One of our subjects showed no consistent bite-block effect on F0, while both of the remaining subjects used a lower F0 for vowels in the bite-block condition. Alternative solutions and criticisms of the assumptions of the present research will also be discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
