Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Journal of the A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Article . 1976 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Perception of vowel duration

Authors: William S.-Y. Wang; Ilse Lehiste; Chin-Kuang Chuang; Nancy Darnovsky;

Perception of vowel duration

Abstract

Lehiste and Pisoni have independently shown that the perception of vowel duration is influenced by the F0 pattern that accompanies the vowel. Here we report some related results. Sixteen subjects are asked to judge the relative duration of pairs of synthesized stimuli. The stimulus pairs are made up of the vowels /i/, /a/, /ai/, and nonspeech, where nonspeech is a single formant at 1500 Hz. The F0 patterns are: level = 120 Hz, rising = 105–135 Hz, and falling = 135 to 105 Hz. The durations are 220, 240, 260, and 280 msec. The orthogonal combination of these factors makes up a total of 512 stimulus pairs. In comparing duration judgements of stimuli of rising (R), falling (F), and level (L) F0's, we found that the following relation obtains: R > F > L, where “>” denotes “perceived as having greater duration.” This relation holds to the same extent for both speech and nonspeech stimuli. There is no signficant difference in the perceived duration between /i/ and /ai/. The most consistent effect, found also earlier in a pilot experiment we performed with 58 subjects, is that /i/ is heard as longer than /a/, in a ratio of 60% : 40%. Since /i/ is normally shorter than /a/ in natural speech, we posit a compensation mechanism mediating between perception and production that is responsible for this negative correlation between vowel height and duration. It is interesting to note that although the processes of duration judgment and pitch judgement (cf. the abstract by Chuang and Wang) are different, they seem to share a common compensation mechanism between production and perception. [Work supported by NSF Grant No. BNS 76-00017-Wang-2/78J34.2.]

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze