Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cochlear injury from tobramycin and other aminoglycosides in guinea pigs

Authors: J. E. Hawkins; D. M. Marques; C. S. Clark;

Cochlear injury from tobramycin and other aminoglycosides in guinea pigs

Abstract

Cochlear toxicity of tobramycin was compared with that of four other aminoglycosidic anitbiotics. Small groups of guinea pigs received tobramycin (TM), gentamicin (GM), neomycin (NM), or kanamycin (KM) in doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for 1–6 weeks; others received KM 200 and 400 mg/kg/day, or dihydrostreptomycin (DHSM) 400 mg/kg/day. Cochlear microphonics were recorded one week after treatment ended, and hair cell losses were plotted as cytocochleograms. Curves relating maximum response (CMmax) to duration of treatment fell less steeply for TM than for GM and NM, but more steeply than for KM. At 200 and 400 mg/kg KM produced moderate or severe deduction in CMmax after 2 weeks. DHSM 400 mg/kg was without effect in 11 of 12 animals treated for 3–6 weeks. Hair-cell losses were roughly consistent with CM levels. In cochleas with only moderate CM loss, inner hair cells often persisted when outer hair cells had disappeared, but with severe CM loss there was also extensive loss of inner hair cells. [Supported by NIH Research Grant NS-05065 and Program Project Grant NS-05785.]

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!