
doi: 10.1121/1.2002155
Environmental noise data, including 24-hour noise surveys, taken at various urban locations throughout the United States have been compiled and compared. The data were taken from the open literature and also from the files of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. It is suggested that the urban noise scene is sufficiently different from the nonurban situation so that, prediction and evaluation schemes commonly used in environmental impact statements are impractical or invalid. For example, relatively sophisticated approaches to traffic noise impact, e.g., the Highway Research Board's design guide (Rep. 117), prove to be intractable for moderately sized projects in urban areas. However, an analysis of the data infers alternate approaches and these are discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
