
doi: 10.1121/1.1974615
The effect of silent-interval duration on the perception of pauses in speech was investigated. The stimuli consisted of five recorded sentences within which the words “lost” and “contact” were manipulated so that their syntactic relation to one another varied in complexity from sentence to sentence. Twelve subjects, working individually, mechanically adjusted the silent-interval duration between the words “lost” and “contact” within each sentence in order to locate (1) the pause detection threshold, (2) optimal fluent pause duration, and (3) minimal hesitation pause duration. Across the five sentences, the mean durations were 6, 186, and 505 msec, for the three pause types, respectively. Statistical analysis, however, showed that silent interval durations for these three pause types differed significantly only when occurring between phrases. This was not true of within-phrase pauses. Thus, contrary to usual assumptions in the literature, these results suggest that for within-phrase pauses, at least, silent-interval duration is an insufficient perceptual cue for differentiation of fluent and hesitation pauses. [Supported by NSF and NIH grants.]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
