Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Pitch Discrimination of Jittered Pulse Trains

Authors: A E, Rosenberg;

Pitch Discrimination of Jittered Pulse Trains

Abstract

Listeners are presented with pulse-train stimulus pairs and asked to judge whether they can hear a difference between them. The interval between pulses is a random variable, identically and independently distributed for each stimulus of a pair. Two distributions are observed: one, nominally Gaussian, and the other, nominally the distribution of the amplitude of a sinusoidal wave whose phase is uniformly distributed. The principal experimental parameters are the mean interval between pulses and rms deviation or jitter about this interval. The stimuli of each pair are identical in other respects, pulse shape (50-μsec pulse width), loudness (30 or 35 dB SL), but differ in polarity pattern. Two pattern combinations are observed. For the range of mean pulse intervals investigated, 5–15 msec, the stimuli of each pair are generally discriminable when unjittered. However, the results indicate that, when jittered in amounts greater than 1 or 1.5 msec, the stimuli may be rendered nondiscriminable. This critical amount of jitter coincides with a flattening of the power-density spectra of the stimuli for frequencies greater than 250 or 300 cps. On the basis of this result and the results of other investigations, it is hypothesized that the correlates of discrimination for unjittered or lightly jittered stimuli are distinct neural volley patterns associated with basilar membrane activity in the 300- to 1000-cps region.

Keywords

Pitch Discrimination, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!