
doi: 10.1121/1.1911275
pmid: 5699047
An attempt is made to identify some of the sources of variability among data on after-effect masking. Suggestions are offered that may prove effective in eliminating or controlling this variability. In addition, generalities apparent in existing data are expressed as hypothetical equations, together with graphs that illustrate the assumed relationships. These hypotheses are discussed within the context of the assumptions underlying them.
Pitch Discrimination, Sound, Auditory Perception, Methods
Pitch Discrimination, Sound, Auditory Perception, Methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
