Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Detectability Threshold for Combination Tones

Authors: R, PLOMP;

Detectability Threshold for Combination Tones

Abstract

Experiments were performed on the detectability threshold for combination tones, defined as the sensation level of primary tones for which combination tones become audible. Investigated were (1) detectability threshold for h−l with (h−l)<<(h+l), where h and l are the frequencies of the higher and lower primary tone, respectively; (2) detectability threshold for 200, 400, and 600 cps with 800+1000 and 800+1400 cps as primary tones; (3) audibility of combination tones for l = 1000 cps and h variable between 1000 and 3000 cps; (4) detectability threshold for the “missing fundamental” of ∑ n−210 cos 2 πnft, with f varying from 125 to 1000 cps. From the experimental data, we may conclude that (1) there are large individual differences in the minimum sensation level of primary tones for which combination tones appear; (2) for usual listening levels of speech and music, the ear's distortion is sufficiently low to avoid audible combination tones; (3) the same holds for the “missing fundamental,” so the fact that the pitch of a complex tone without fundamental is equal to the pitch of this tone cannot be explained by the assumption that the fundamental tone is reintroduced in the listener's ear; (4) the fact that the detectability thresholds for combination tones are significantly lower for small than for large tone intervals indicates that, for both cases, the ear's distortion cannot be represented by the same nonlinear characteristic and supports the evidence that the tones are produced in the inner ear.

Keywords

Sound, Hearing, Ear, Inner, Hearing Tests, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    136
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
136
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!