Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Noise Bands versus Pure Tones as Stimuli in Measuring the Acoustic Attenuation of Ear Protective Devices

Authors: J. C. Webster; P. O. Thompson; H. R. Beitscher;

Noise Bands versus Pure Tones as Stimuli in Measuring the Acoustic Attenuation of Ear Protective Devices

Abstract

The sound-exclusion properties (acoustic attenuation) of various earphones and ear defenders and combinations thereof were determined by the binaural, free-field, absolute-threshold-shift technique with the psychophysical method of adjustment. The earphones included dynamic earphones in two different sockets and hearing-aid-type receivers with individually molded inserts. The ear defenders included certain conventional and newly developed earplugs and muffs, and a hard-shelled noise-exclusion helmet. In a preliminary evaluation of a limited number of devices, both tones and noise bands were used as stimuli, and comparative results are shown. In evaluating the effectiveness of some of the newer devices, noise bands alone were used. For the exclusion of external sound, particularly that below 1200 cps, the order of merit for earphone combinations was: (l) large volume muffs with insert phones; (2) helmet with insert phones; (3) semiplastic sockets with dynamic phones; and (4) helmet with dynamic phones. The best combination provided the following amounts of attenuation in the seven octave bands from 75 to 9600 cps: 14, 22, 28, 33, 38, 44, and 40.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!