<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A series of experiments were performed to compare the efficiency of different diffusing devices in producing a completely random sound field in a reverberation chamber and the effectiveness of some of the methods for judging whether a sound field is completely random. An additional experiment was performed to compare two types of test signals, viz., warble tone and the same nominal band width of random noise. Results of these measurements indicate the general superiority of the rotating vane over other diffusing devices and superiority of random noise over warble tone in producing a smooth decay curve. One of the significant conclusions is that even when the diffusion is reasonably adequate the measured absorption coefficient of a standard sample appears to vary with the chamber absorption especially at the high frequencies.
Acoustics, Acoustique
Acoustics, Acoustique
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |