Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Infants’ sensitivity to broadband noise

Authors: L A, Werner; K, Boike;

Infants’ sensitivity to broadband noise

Abstract

Infants have higher pure-tone thresholds than adults. One explanation is that infants do not adopt the frequency-selective listening strategy that adults use when detecting tones. In contrast to other models of infants’ immature sensitivity, the listening strategy account predicts that infants will be more sensitive to broadband sounds, relative to adults. Infants 7–9 months old were tested in two experiments to examine their sensitivity to broadband noise. Unmasked and masked thresholds for a 1000-Hz tone and for broadband noise were estimated adaptively for infants and adults using an observer-based behavioral procedure. The difference between infants and adults in unmasked threshold were 14 and 7 dB for tones and noise, respectively. The difference between infants and adults in masked threshold were 10 and 5 dB for tones and noise, respectively. Psychometric functions for detection of broadband noise were also obtained from some infants and adults. Infants’ psychometric functions were similar to those obtained in tone detection with shallower slopes and lower upper asymptotes than adults’. This suggests that the relative improvement in infants’ threshold for broadband noise is not due to greater attentiveness to the noise. A model of infants’ sound detection invoking inattentiveness, listening strategy, and an unspecified source of internal noise may account for the characteristics of the infant psychometric function.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Signal Detection, Psychological, Time Factors, Adolescent, Age Factors, Infant, Auditory Threshold, Auditory Perception, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Noise, Perceptual Masking, Psychoacoustics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    47
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
47
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!