
doi: 10.1118/1.596544
pmid: 2308544
The recent article by Niemierko and Goitein [Med. Phys. 16, 239–247 (1989)] illustrates well the errors which are occurring in plotting isodose lines. We wish to augment their analysis with similar work done at Cardiff a few years ago; to indicate some practical treatment outcomes they have omitted; to propose even more stringent requirements of the grid size used; and thus to further alert users and software manufacturers to this problem.
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Technology, Radiologic, Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Technology, Radiologic, Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
