Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 1987 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Medical Physics
Article . 1987
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The variability of clinical thermoluminescent dosimetry systems: A multi‐institutional study

Authors: H I, Amols; M S, Weinhous; L E, Reinstein;

The variability of clinical thermoluminescent dosimetry systems: A multi‐institutional study

Abstract

Thirty‐two radiotherapy centers in the USA and Canada cooperated in a study of the variability of clinical thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) systems. The primary purpose of the survey was to ascertain the accuracy of TLD for the determination of in vivo dose measurements. Each participating institution provided two TLD packets for irradiation on a Clinac 4, at a prearranged time. Two batch irradiations were made. Thirty‐two TLD packets, one from each institution, were uniformly irradiated to a dose of 22.35 cGy (known by us, but not by the participants). A second group of 32 packets were likewise irradiated to a dose of 179.0 cGy. Participants were told only that their TLD's would be irradiated to doses between 10 and 50 cGy, and 100 to 200 cGy. TLD's were then returned to the institutions of origin for readout, and the doses reported to us for analysis. Calibration factors, readout and annealing procedures, etc., were all established independently by each participant. Although these procedures varied widely between institutions, the mean values of the reported doses were within 5% and 3% of the expected values for the low and high doses, respectively. Standard deviations in the reported doses were 10% and 5%. Also of interest, however, is the finding that 22% (i.e, 14 out of 64) of the dose reportings were in error by more than 10%. The implications of these findings vis à vis radiotherapy are discussed.

Keywords

Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!