Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

SU-FF-T-284: Characterising An Electron Pencil Beam: Monte Carlo vs Measurement

Authors: M Ebert; M Barnes;

SU-FF-T-284: Characterising An Electron Pencil Beam: Monte Carlo vs Measurement

Abstract

Purpose:Electron beams from linear accelerators have widely varying characteristics in terms of spectral properties, mixtures of electrons and photons, spatial and angular characteristics. Characterizing pencil beams for pencil‐beam based calculations and for complex electron optimization calculations is thus necessary for individual electron beams. We evaluated an extrapolation method for characterizing an electron pencil beam and compared a Monte Carlo based method with measurement. Method and Materials:Radiographic film was used to measure narrow 12 MeV electron beams from a Varian 21EX accelerator. A series of circular beams was considered, collimated with LMPA material between diameters of 1.5 and 32 millimeters. Beam profiles were measured at discrete depths, and the presence of photon contamination from the LMPA was accounted for by subtracting measurements for a solid piece of LMPA. From these measurements, an extrapolation was made to estimate the distribution for a 0.1 mm diameter beam. A similar process was carried out using EGSnrc Monte Carlo, with electron beamcharacteristics determined using BEAM.Results: A large amount of similarity was found between pencil beam distributions extrapolated from film‐measured and Monte Carlo derived data. Given the amount of noise present in the measured and simulated results, the curve‐fitting procedure yielded relatively smooth and appropriate pencil beam distributions. It was also found that the parameters from the curve‐fitting could be used to extract central axis percentage depth dose distributions which were consistent (past dmax) with measured broad beam data. Conclusion: This study showed that the extrapolation method is appropriate for derivation of dose distributions for very narrow beams. A Monte Carlo simulated narrow beam distribution would normally be sufficient for characterizing such a distribution, though if high resolution is required, the extrapolation method would be useful.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!