Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

SU‐FF‐T‐11: Dosimetry Comparison of LDR 137Cs and LDR 252Cf Brachytherapy Sources

Authors: C Melhus; H Zinkin; M Rivard;

SU‐FF‐T‐11: Dosimetry Comparison of LDR 137Cs and LDR 252Cf Brachytherapy Sources

Abstract

Purpose: Hundreds of patients have received gynecological brachytherapy treatments in the US using applicator tube‐type (AT) low dose rate (LDR) 252Cf sources. However, its mixed‐field radiation dose distributions have not been characterized using the AAPM Task Group 43 dosimetry formalism, nor quantitatively compared to conventional photon‐emitting sources. Towards clinical implementation of LDR 252Cf brachytherapy for gynecological applications, the mixed‐field dosimetry for this source type has been modeled using Monte Carlo methods and compared to dose distributions produced by LDR 137Cs brachytherapy sources. Method and Materials: Mixed‐field dose distributions in the vicinity of an AT LDR 252Cf brachytherapy source were calculated using MCNP5 in a 50 cm diameter spherical phantom composed of water, soft tissue, and muscle. ENDF 252Cf neutron energy spectrum was used. Published 252Cf photon energy spectra were employed and compared. The MCNP F4 and F6 calculation tallies were utilized for determining various dosimetric components. These include the source photon, neutron capture photon, fast neutron, and thermal neutron dose components. The LDR 137Cs source used for comparison was the 3M Model 6500. Results: Brachytherapy dosimetry parameters for LDR 252Cf neutrons were in agreement with previously published values. TG‐43 dosimetry parameters for 252Cf photons exhibited a maximum g(r) value at 10 cm due to induction of capture photons in the phantom and a general decrease in anisotropy with increasing radial distance. 252Cf photon spectra including estimates of delayed photons exhibited −2% difference in g(r) and 5% relative variation in anisotropy at θ = 0°. Dose distributions generated from dosimetry parameters for LDR AT 252Cf were similar to those produced by conventional 137 Cs sources using the Pinnacle 3 Planning System. Conclusion: Using appropriate radiobiological weighting for 252Cf neutrons, treatment planning for AT LDR 252Cf sources may be performed and compared to conventional 137Cs dosimetry for gynecological applications.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!