Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluating Imager Resolution

Evaluating Imager Resolution

Abstract

This chapter describes a procedure for evaluating imager resolution. A resolution metric is presented that predicts the effect of imager blur, noise, and sampling on the probability of correctly identifying targets. The targeting task performance (TTP) metric predicts the results of the target identification experiments described in Chapter 6. The resolution metric quantifies the ability to identify objects and, in general, to discriminate scene details. Target acquisition task performance depends on how well information is coupled from the scene to the observer. System performance cannot be predicted without considering the characteristics of human vision. Imager noise is unimportant if it is too fine grained to bother the observer. Imager resolution is wasted if it far exceeds human acuity. Figure 7.1 shows an imager connected to a display and viewed by an observer. Observer vision is treated as a "black box." Psychophysical data are used to characterize visual thresholds and noise. The imager is evaluated by determining how well input spatial information is coupled to the human visual system. Experimentally, resolution predicts the probability of identifying objects in a known target set. Mathematically, resolution is calculated by stimulating the imager with a broad frequency spectrum. The TTP metric is an integral of all of the spatial frequency content that exceeds visual thresholds. TTP quantifies how well input spatial information is coupled to the observer. Poor coupling reduces the probability of identifying objects. Good coupling improves the probability of identifying objects. TTP is validated by the fact that it predicts experimental object identification probabilities.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!