Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Medical Image Interpretation

Authors: Matthew S. Brown; Michael F. McNitt-Gray;

Medical Image Interpretation

Abstract

The goal of medical image processing is to assist a human expert (e.g., a radiologist) in the task of identifying and interpreting all of the useful information available in an image. A medical image interpretation system constructs an internal model of the anatomy contained in the image so that it can be processed in an anatomical domain rather than simply as an array of gray levels. This allows the image interpretation system to incorporate anatomical (expert) knowledge into its analysis of the image and go beyond conventional image processing techniques. A medical image interpretation system brings to bear knowledge that is specific to the imaging system and∕or the anatomy being imaged. This knowledge can be used to assist in solving the medical imaging problem at hand, whether it be identification of tissue for measurement (e.g., tumor volume to assess response to therapy) or tissue classification (e.g., determining whether the tumor is benign or malignant). The use of domain knowledge via image interpretation techniques is important both in segmenting anatomical structures and analyzing them afterwards. Image interpretation techniques become necessary in many situations where conventional image processing and segmentation techniques are not sufficient. Conventional techniques may be adequate when the target object is relatively homogeneous and surrounded by a homogeneous, and sufficiently different, background. In this case, the object is easily segmented. This sometimes occurs in medical images, for example, an isolated lung nodule surrounded by well-aerated lung, imaged using computed tomography (CT). However, there are many situations where two (or more) separate tissues or organs overlap in an image and have the same range of gray values (representing similar physical characteristics under the specific imaging modality used). For example, in conventional radiography, where many tissues overlap due to the projectional nature of the imaging modality, a lung nodule may not be easily segmented if it overlaps with rib shadows. Similar problems can also arise in 3D image data, such as in segmenting the kidneys in CT because they are connected to other organs via vascular structures and may also be in contact with adjacent soft tissue structures (e.g., liver or spleen). In these cases, conventional segmentation methods such as the edge-, region-, or histogram-based methods (Chapter 2) are inadequate as they cannot distinguish between these adjacent tissues. Further processing is required to accurately identify each tissue or organ. Similar situations arise when the imaging system has poor spatial resolution, poor contrast resolution, when the image is noisy, or when more systematic errors (e.g., field inhomogeneities in magnetic resonance imaging) exist. Under such conditions, additional information is required to identify tissues and organs during image interpretation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!