
pmid: 3246905
The advantages to be expected of full-scale PACS implementation are widely described in the literature. In the decision to introduce such systems, costs will also play an important part. The benefits to be achieved should at least outbalance the costs. In this paper the set-up of a software package for cost assessment is described. The configuration requirements have to be determined based on the workload of the radiology department and a PACS model using results of simulation studies. Of course additional user requirements are important input parameters (e.g. number of workstations, screen resolution, etc.). Data on costs of the various configuration components and the expected future trends in these costs will be used to estimate the costs of a specific PACS configuration as a function of time. Savings to be achieved in the various categories of resources will be input (again with their trends) to lead to an overview of the total savings to be expected. The package will result in a graph of the net annual costs as a function of the timing of PACS introduction. In the package a critique module is foreseen that checks whether the data fed into the system are of reasonable agreement with expert opinions.
Radiology Information Systems, Radiology Department, Hospital, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Costs and Cost Analysis, Hospital Departments, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Computer Simulation, Software, Netherlands
Radiology Information Systems, Radiology Department, Hospital, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Costs and Cost Analysis, Hospital Departments, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Computer Simulation, Software, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
