
doi: 10.1117/12.937709
The visual features most important for object recognition are those having to do with the shape of an object. In one approach to recognition The image is decomposed an image into a set of relatively simple shapes (parts) and predicates that describe these parts and the relationships between them. Recognition is a matter of matching this parts-relations description to some parts-relations model in a large database of models. Matching is computationally intensive; unless the parts-relations representation is organized for efficient indexing, recognition times get intractably long. We review general requirements for such a representation as proposed by Marr and Nishihara[1]. Their prescription leaves open general questions that must be answered in any particular implementation. We offer some solutions for a simple domain of 2-D sticklike objects and point out some aspects of the implementa-tion that might be useful for shape indexing in other domains.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
