Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Novel method for automated determination of the cancellation parameter in dual-energy imaging: evaluation using anthropomorphic phantom images

Authors: John M. Sabol; Gopal B. Avinash;

Novel method for automated determination of the cancellation parameter in dual-energy imaging: evaluation using anthropomorphic phantom images

Abstract

Dual-energy imaging shows increased conspicuity and specificity of lung nodule detection through the removal of undesired contrast resulting from overlying bone structures. We have developed an algorithm that automatically determines the optimal cancellation parameters for a log-subtraction technique for a pair of high- and low-energy images. The core algorithm involves shrinking the data, extracting bone features, extracting salient edge from these bone features, calculating a tissue-cancellation map, computing the maximum-likelihood bone contrast cancellation parameter, and finally, calculating the soft-tissue cancellation parameter using an empirical relationship. We verified the performance of the algorithm using observer studies, in which the value of the tissue-cancellation parameter calculated by the algorithm was compared to the value manually selected by nineteen trained observers. A number of dual-energy images were acquired with a modified GE Revolution XQ/i, flat-panel-detector chest imaging system, using an anthropomorphic phantom. The effects of variables such as patient size, kVp, mAs, lung texture, patient motion, and the presence of foreign objects in field-of-view on algorithmic performance were evaluated. We found that the algorithm-selected parameter values had less variability than those selected by the observers. Furthermore, the algorithm-selected parameter was within the limits of the variability of the observers for all cases.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!