Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Noise/dose reduction and image improvements in screening virtual colonoscopy with tube currents of 20 mAs with nonlinear Gaussian filter chains

Authors: Georg-Friedemann Rust; Volker Aurich; Maximilian Reiser;

Noise/dose reduction and image improvements in screening virtual colonoscopy with tube currents of 20 mAs with nonlinear Gaussian filter chains

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate a filter method to extract noise from 20mAs Computed Tomography (CT) data for virtual colonoscopy screening. Method: Nonlinear Gaussian filter chains (NLGF) applied to CT datasets were used to extract noise. To test the efficiency of NLGF a simulation of different ellipsoidal shells with different levels of noise were used. Phantom studies were performed using a multidetector CT (tube currents 10 to 140mAs). 15 patients at high risk for colon cancer underwent a virtual colonoscopy examination (140mAs) and conventional colonoscopy. Different noise levels were added to each CT raw dataset (analog to 40 and 20mAs scans). Virtual endoscopic fly-throughs were performed and rated by two radiologists (image quality). Results: NLGF were able to extract image noise while preserving image structures down to signal--to--noise ratio levels of 0.5. The phantom studies (perspex bars, simulated polyps) were reconstructed without relevant changes between 20 and 140mAs. There were no significant differences between the endoscopic fly-throughs of 140 and 20mAs examinations (2 readers). Conclusion: NLGF is a promising preprocessing method for effective noise reduction in CT datasets. Edges are preserved as well as accentuated in high contrast images.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!