Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A line-of-sight approach for non-line-of-sight imaging (Conference Presentation)

Authors: Marco La Manna; Xioachun Liu; Ji-Hyun Nam; Martin Laurenzis; Andreas Velten;

A line-of-sight approach for non-line-of-sight imaging (Conference Presentation)

Abstract

Standard imaging systems, such as cameras, radars and lidars, are becoming a big part of our everyday life when it comes to detection, tracking and recognition of targets that are in the direct line-of-sight (LOS) of the imaging system. Challenges however start to arise when the objects are not in the system’s LOS, typically when an occluder is obstructing the imager’s field of view. This is known as non-line-of-sight (NLOS) and it is approached in different ways depending on the imager’s operating wavelength. We consider an optical imaging system and the literature offers different approaches from a component and recovery algorithm point of view. In our optical setup, we assume a system comprising an ultra-fast laser and a single photon avalanche diode (SPAD). The former is used to sequentially illuminate different points on a diffuser (relay) wall, causing the photons to uniformly scatter in all directions, including the target’s location. The latter component collects the scattered photons as a function of time. In post-processing, back-projection based algorithms are employed to recover the target’s image. Recent publications focused their attention on showing the quality of the results, as well as potential algorithm improvements. Here we show results based on a novel theoretical approach (coined as “phasor fields”), which suggests treating the NLOS imaging problem as a LOS one. The key feature is to consider the relay wall as a virtual sensor, created by the different points illuminated on the wall. Results show the superiority of this method compared to standard approaches.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!