<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Algorithms for image segmentation (including object recognition and delineation) are influenced by the quality of object appearance in the image and overall image quality. However, the issue of how to perform segmentation evaluation as a function of these quality factors has not been addressed in the literature. In this paper, we present a solution to this problem. We devised a set of key quality criteria that influence segmentation (global and regional): posture deviations, image noise, beam hardening artifacts (streak artifacts), shape distortion, presence of pathology, object intensity deviation, and object contrast. A trained reader assigned a grade to each object for each criterion in each study. We developed algorithms based on logical predicates for determining a 1 to 10 numeric quality score for each object and each image from reader-assigned quality grades. We analyzed these object and image quality scores (OQS and IQS, respectively) in our data cohort by gender and age. We performed recognition and delineation of all objects using recent adaptations [8, 9] of our Automatic Anatomy Recognition (AAR) framework [6] and analyzed the accuracy of recognition and delineation of each object. We illustrate our method on 216 head & neck and 211 thoracic cancer computed tomography (CT) studies.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |