Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Assessment of RCTA research

Authors: Lenny Sapronov; Rick Camden; Mary Anne Fields; Craig Lennon; Marshal Childers; Ed Weller; Andrew Dornbush; +2 Authors

Assessment of RCTA research

Abstract

The Army Research Laboratory’s Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance is a program intended to change robots from tools that soldiers use into teammates alongside which soldiers can work. This requires the integration of fundamental and applied research in robotic perception, intelligence, manipulation, mobility, and human-robot interaction. In this paper, we present the results of assessments conducted in 2016 to evaluate the capabilities of a new robot, the Robotic Manipulator (RoMan), and of a cognitive architecture (ACT-R). The RoMan platform was evaluated on its ability to conduct a search and grasp task under a variety of conditions. Specifically, it was required to search for and recognize a gas can placed on the floor, and then pick it up. The RoMan showed the potential to be a good platform for autonomous manipulation, but the autonomy used in these experiments will require improvement to make full use of the platform’s capabilities. The cognitive architecture was evaluated as to how well it could learn to select an appropriate set of features for a classification task. The task was to classify emotions that had been encoded using the Facial Action Coding System, with ACT-R learning to select the most effective set of features for correct classification. ACT-R leaned rules which required it to observe about half of the available features to make a decision, and the subsequent decisions had an accuracy ranging from 76% to 93% (depending on the emotion).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?