Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cathodoluminescence of HgCdTe and CdTe on CdTe and sapphire

Authors: L. O. Bubulac; W. E. Tennant; D. D. Edwall; E. R. Gertner; J. C. Robinson;

Cathodoluminescence of HgCdTe and CdTe on CdTe and sapphire

Abstract

The imaging cathodoluminescence capability of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was complemented by etch pit (EP) measurements and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) to characterize structures of HgCdTe LPE grown both on CdTe and CdTe/sapphire (PACE-1) (Ref. 1: W. E. Tennant, IEDM Technical Digest 1983, 704) substrates. In addition to providing the source for luminescence, the high-power-density SEM beam was exploited to perform in situ annealing which improved the CL efficiency and aided in the analysis. Selected CL/SEM data are shown for substrates, epilayers and interfaces. CdTe Bridgman grown substrates exhibited defect structures (twins, dislocations, precipitates, subgrain structure) and substantial differences in CL efficiency and response to electron beam (EB) annealing. Cd annealing of Bridgman substrates increases CL efficiency, removes sensitivity to EB annealing, and causes impurity redistribution as measured by SIMS. PACE-1 substrates show higher defect density, an absence of subgrains, and more uniform defect distribution in contrast to CdTe Bridgman substrates. The defect characteristics of the epilayers grown on CdTe substrates were found to depend on Hg content in the epilayer. CdTe epilayers tend to reproduce CdTe substrates. Hg1−xCdxTe (x≂0.93) epilayers have no subgrains, and a much lower defect density (∼mid 104/cm2). A highly dislocated and disturbed interface was observed in Hg1−xCdxTe (x≂0.3)/CdTe (on a chemically angle etched surface) and in Hg1−xCdxTe (x≂0.93)/CdTe (cleaved cross section samples). Improvement in the CL intensity from the epilayer was seen with distance from the interface. Both termination of substrate defects and origin of epilayer defects at the interface was observed.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!