Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Growth-controlled cubic zirconia microstructure in zirconia–titania nanolaminates

Authors: C. R. Aita; J. D. DeLoach; Chun-Keung Loong;

Growth-controlled cubic zirconia microstructure in zirconia–titania nanolaminates

Abstract

Zirconia microstructure selection (phase and crystallographic orientation) was studied in sputter-deposited multilayer films consisting of nanocrystalline ZrO2 and amorphous TiO2. The goal was to understand the mechanism for ZrO2 microstructure selection as a function of nanolaminate architecture (number of interfaces and ZrO2 and TiO2 layer thickness) in a growth regime of limited surface diffusion. The results show that there are two competing paths that ZrO2 microstructure can follow in a ZrO2–TiO2 nanolaminate. One path depends upon geometric shadowing resulting in the formation of a columnar morphology within a ZrO2 layer. This path leads to cubic (220) growth as an intermediate microstructure, and ultimately to the formation of cubic (200) crystallites spanning several bilayers. In this case, ZrO2 renucleation within a layer is suppressed. The second path depends upon renucleation within a ZrO2 layer, involving first tetragonal (111) formation, and then the transformation of tetragonal (111) to monoclinic(11-1)-(111), consistent with a finite crystal size effect. The establishment and maintenance of a columnar morphology (and hence, the suppression of renucleation events), ultimately leads to cubic (200) growth, and is consistent with a growth-controlled microstructure selection mechanism. This mechanism appears to strongly depend upon the existence and planar quality of the TiO2 growth–restart surfaces.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?