
doi: 10.1114/1.1553455
pmid: 12680725
When a brief current pulse is incident on excitable cells in cardiac and other nervous tissue, a change in phase of the cell's response is usually observed. In cardiac tissue, the cells are exposed to external stimulation of mainly positive currents, which depolarize the cells. We performed a systematic study of the effect of depolarizing stimuli, covering timing, magnitude, and duration, and demonstrated that all of these parameters influence the phase response of the cell. The phase response of our model cell compares favorably with measurements on isolated sinoatrial node cells. We investigated the phase response to single depolarizing stimuli as a function of the stimulus parameters (phase response curves), and then studied cell responses to the combined effect of a pulse train (entrainment phenomena). The range of magnitudes and durations for the stimuli were 0.01-5 nA and 0.01-50 ms. Comparisons of the entrainment properties of the model with experimental results show good agreement with similar modes and different entrainment ratios occurring for similar basic cycle lengths (as functions of the unperturbed cell period). Our results demonstrate that any combination of parameters that provide the same charge transfer to the cell causes a similar phase response, independent of the specific magnitude and duration for the entire range of stimuli investigated.
Models, Neurological, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Models, Cardiovascular, Neural Conduction, Action Potentials, Reproducibility of Results, Adaptation, Physiological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Electric Stimulation, Membrane Potentials, Animals, Humans, Computer Simulation, Sinoatrial Node
Models, Neurological, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Models, Cardiovascular, Neural Conduction, Action Potentials, Reproducibility of Results, Adaptation, Physiological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Electric Stimulation, Membrane Potentials, Animals, Humans, Computer Simulation, Sinoatrial Node
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
