
This article performs a comparative study of alternative Brazilian output gap measures. In addition to characterizing business cycles, it measures the inflation-output relationships and also examines each alternative’s contributions to inflation forecasting. The output gaps are shown to be highly correlated among each other and the business cycle phases that they indicate coincide with those of the CODACE (Business Cycle Dating Committee). The output gap measures seem to capture the positive inflation-output gap relationship suggested in the Phillips curve, beating the univariate autoregressive inflation model in terms of inflation prediction. Among the analyzed gaps, a simplified version of Labauch and Williams (2003) provides the best forecasts.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
