<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
New Findings What is the topic of this review? This review summarizes the development of gene editing from early proof‐of‐concept studies in the 1980s to contemporary programmable and RNA‐guided nucleases, which enable rapid and precise alteration of DNA sequences of almost any living cell. What advances does it highlight? With an average of one clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) Cas9 paper published every 4 h in 2017, this review cannot highlight all new developments, but a number of key improvements, including increases in efficiency, a range of new options to reduce off‐target effects and plans for CRISPR to enter clinical trials in 2018, are discussed. AbstractGenome editing enables precise changes to be made in the genome of living cells. The technique was originally developed in the 1980s but largely limited to use in mice. The discovery that a targeted double‐stranded break at a unique site in the genome, close to the site to be changed, could substantially increase the efficiency of editing raised the possibility of using the technique in a broader range of animal models and, potentially, human cells. But the challenge was to identify reagents that could create targeted breaks at a unique genomic location with minimal off‐target effects. In 2005, the demonstration that programmable zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) could perform this task led to a number of proof‐of‐concept studies, but a limitation was the ease with which effective ZFNs could be produced. In 2009, the development of TAL effector nucleases (TALENs) increased the specificity of gene editing and the ease of design and production. However, it was not until 2013 and the development of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) Cas9/guide RNA that gene editing became a research tool that any laboratory could use.
Gene Editing, Genome, gene editing, gRNA, TAL-effector nuclease, Gene editing, Endonucleases, zinc finger nuclease, Cystic fibrosis, Zinc Finger Nucleases, guide RNA, cystic fibrosis, TALEN, CRISPR, Animals, Humans, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cas9, ZFN, Genome editing
Gene Editing, Genome, gene editing, gRNA, TAL-effector nuclease, Gene editing, Endonucleases, zinc finger nuclease, Cystic fibrosis, Zinc Finger Nucleases, guide RNA, cystic fibrosis, TALEN, CRISPR, Animals, Humans, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Cas9, ZFN, Genome editing
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |