
doi: 10.1111/wrr.13162
pmid: 38426336
AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare outcomes of moderate and severe foot infections in people with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). We retrospectively evaluated 382 patients (77% with DM and 23% non‐DM). We collected demographic data, co‐morbidities and one‐year outcomes including healing, surgical interventions, number of surgeries, length of stay, re‐infection and re‐hospitalisation. DM patients required more surgeries (2.3 ± 2.2 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3, p = 0.01), but did not have a longer hospital length of stay during the index hospitalisation (DM 10.9 days ±9.2 vs. non‐DM = 8.8 days ±5.8, p = 0.43). After the index hospitalisation, DM patients had increased rates of re‐hospitalisation for any reason (63.3% vs. 35.2%, CI 1.9–5.2, OR 3.2, p < 0.01), re‐infection at the index wound infection site (48% vs. 30.7%, CI 1.3–3.5, OR 2.1, p < 0.01), re‐hospitalisation for a foot pathology (47.3% vs. 29.5%, CI 1.3–3.6, OR 2.1, p < 0.01), and longer times to ulcer healing (151.8 days ±108.8 vs. 108.8 ± 90.6 days, p = 0.04). Patients with DM admitted to hospital with foot infections have worse clinical outcomes during the index hospitalisation and are more likely to have re‐infection and re‐admission to hospital in the next year.
Male, Wound Healing, Middle Aged, Length of Stay, Patient Readmission, Diabetic Foot, Amputation, Surgical, Wound Infection, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged
Male, Wound Healing, Middle Aged, Length of Stay, Patient Readmission, Diabetic Foot, Amputation, Surgical, Wound Infection, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
