
doi: 10.1111/vop.70049
pmid: 41327815
ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether cephalic index (CI) affects intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using rebound tonometry. Methods 33 client‐owned dogs were included. Measurements of skull length and width were taken using calipers, and CI was calculated as (skull width (mm) x 100)/(skull length (mm)). IOP measurements were taken using rebound tonometry (iCare TonoVet). Results 33 dogs were included in this study. CI ranged from 45–105, with an average of 63. Measured IOP was not impacted by CI ( p = 0.2604). Conclusions No effect of CI was detected when using the TonoVet to measure IOP. A larger study may be necessary to determine if CI affects IOP using various methods of IOP measurement.
Male, Tonometry, Ocular, Dogs, Reference Values, Skull, Animals, Female, Intraocular Pressure
Male, Tonometry, Ocular, Dogs, Reference Values, Skull, Animals, Female, Intraocular Pressure
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
