
doi: 10.1111/vde.12515
pmid: 29285807
BackgroundGeneralized demodicosis is a common disease in dogs and doramectin has been reported as a successful treatment. Different treatment protocols using doramectin have not been previously evaluated.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether oral administration of doramectin twice a week is more effective than administration by subcutaneous injection once a week.AnimalsTwenty nine privately owned dogs affected with generalized demodicosis.MethodsDogs randomly received one of two treatments. Sixteen dogs were treated with 600 μg/kg doramectin by subcutaneous injection once a week and 13 dogs received 600 μg/kg doramectin by oral administration twice a week.ResultsThe mean age of affected dogs was 2.8 and 2.6 years (P= 0.587) and the mean mite number detected at the initial evaluation was 201 and 287 (P= 0.04), respectively, for each group. The mean time to achieve negative skin scrapings was 13 and 12 weeks, respectively (P= 0.955). Adult‐onset demodicosis affected five of 16 and two of 13 dogs, respectively (P= 0.662). The success rate for treatment was 13 of 16 (81%) of dogs receiving subcutaneous injections once a week and 12 of 13 (92%) dogs receiving oral dosaging twice a week. (P= 0.691). Four dogs did not achieve disease remission. In the 12 month follow‐up period, one dog that had received the once a week protocol relapsed after eight weeks of treatment withdrawal. Adverse effects were not observed in any dog.ConclusionBased on the results of this study, oral administration of doramectin twice a week does not achieve a more rapid resolution of canine generalized demodicosis than administration by subcutaneous injection once a week. The treatment success rate was the same for both protocols.
Male, Insecticides, Mite Infestations, Ivermectin, Injections, Subcutaneous, Imidazoles, Administration, Oral, Scabies, Dogs, Treatment Outcome, Animals, Female, Dog Diseases, Macrolides
Male, Insecticides, Mite Infestations, Ivermectin, Injections, Subcutaneous, Imidazoles, Administration, Oral, Scabies, Dogs, Treatment Outcome, Animals, Female, Dog Diseases, Macrolides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
