
doi: 10.1111/tra.12033
pmid: 23217120
Ribosomes tightly interact with protein‐conducting channels in the plasma membrane of bacteria (SecYEG) and in the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotes (Sec61 complex). This interaction is mediated by multiple junctions and is highly conserved during evolution. Although it is well known that both ribosomal proteins and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are involved in the ribosome–channel interaction, detailed analyses on how these components contribute to this binding are lacking. Here, we demonstrate that the evolutionary conservation of ribosome binding is solely mediated by rRNA. Moreover, we show that in vitro transcribed 23 S rRNA binds with similar characteristics to protein translocation channels as native 23 S rRNA or 50 S ribosomal subunits. This indicates that base modifications, which exist in native rRNA, do not crucially influence the binding. In two of the ribosome‐channel junctions (c1 and c2), exclusively rRNA helices are involved. Using in vitro transcribed rRNA mutants, we now provide evidence that large parts of the rRNA can be deleted without altering its binding properties, as long as the rRNA helices of the c1 and c2 junctions remain intact. We demonstrate that the connection sites c1 and c2 generate high‐affinity binding sites that act independently of each other. This could explain why membrane‐bound ribosomes have an extremely low off‐rate.
RNA Folding, Binding Sites, Base Sequence, Escherichia coli Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation, Dogs, RNA, Ribosomal, Mutation, Ribosome Subunits, Animals, Amino Acid Sequence, SEC Translocation Channels, Protein Binding
RNA Folding, Binding Sites, Base Sequence, Escherichia coli Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Docking Simulation, Dogs, RNA, Ribosomal, Mutation, Ribosome Subunits, Animals, Amino Acid Sequence, SEC Translocation Channels, Protein Binding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
