<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1111/tog.12039
Key content Routine diagnostic hysteroscopy under general anaesthesia is an anachronism. Evidence‐based RCOG guidance should be followed to ensure best practice in outpatient hysteroscopy. The role of hysteroscopy in the diagnostic work‐up of abnormal bleeding and reproduction remains unclear and further research is required to elucidate where it can be used most cost‐effectively. Learning objectives A ‘no touch’ vaginoscopic technique should be employed routinely as this approach reduces pain during diagnostic rigid outpatient hysteroscopy and facilitates operative procedures by improving manipulation of miniature endoscopic equipment. A contemporary outpatient hysteroscopy service should be able to provide surgical treatments for uterine polyps, small fibroids, lost coils, minor uterine anomalies, menstrual disorders and permanent contraception. Ethical issues Can we justify subjecting women, especially those with significant medical co‐morbidities, to the risks and inconvenience of general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic procedures?
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |