Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Transactions in GISarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Transactions in GIS
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Detecting Pteridium arachnoideum and Tithonia diversifolia in a Multiclass Land‐Cover Framework in the Cerrado: A Deep Learning Time‐Series Benchmark With Spatial Cross‐Validation

Authors: Leandro de Arruda Bruno; Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior; Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho; Potira Meirelles Hermuche;

Detecting Pteridium arachnoideum and Tithonia diversifolia in a Multiclass Land‐Cover Framework in the Cerrado: A Deep Learning Time‐Series Benchmark With Spatial Cross‐Validation

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents the first deep‐learning time‐series benchmark for detecting two encroaching species in the Brazilian Cerrado: the native super‐dominant fern Pteridium arachnoideum and the invasive alien shrub Tithonia diversifolia . We evaluate 43 architectures across six families (CNNs, RNNs, Transformers, and three hybrid groups) on monthly Planet NICFI satellite imagery in Brazil's Federal District, adopting a 13‐class land‐use/land‐cover scheme with 16,250 samples. CNNs and hybrid CNN + RNN models achieve the highest accuracy, with FCN and LSTM‐FCN emerging as the most robust architectures (F1 > 98% under random splitting, ∼82% under spatial cross‐validation). Tithonia diversifolia is reliably detected across spatially independent regions owing to its distinctive flowering phenology (F1 > 95%), whereas P. arachnoideum exhibits greater spatial variability (F1 > 76%) due to spectral overlap with forest formations. Wall‐to‐wall classification maps confirm ecologically coherent spatial distributions for both species. Spatially independent five‐fold cross‐validation reveals that conventional random splitting inflates performance by 16–25 percentage points across all architecture groups. These results provide practical guidance for selecting architectures suited to operational monitoring and underscore the importance of spatially independent evaluation in remote‐sensing classification.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid