
Summary Background Paediatric patients ( PP s) often feel that they are not involved in care and treatment decisions. Although training clinicians may help, there is a lack of evaluated training programmes specifically for work with PP s. The aim of this article is to evaluate ‘Me first’, a training programme aimed at improving clinicians’ attitudes and communication skills when working with PP s. Methods A total of 69 clinicians attended ‘Me first’ training and completed questionnaires across three time points: (1) prior to attending the training; (2) at the end of the training; and (3) 4–6 weeks later. This included 14 medical staff, 29 nursing staff and 26 allied health staff. Attitude was measured using the Leeds Attitudes to Concordance II ( LATC on II ) scale, and communication skills were measured using the Effective Listening and Interactive Communication Scale ( ELICS ). Results Overall, clinicians reported that their attitude and communication skills improved after attending ‘Me first’. This was maintained 4–6 weeks later. Subgroup analysis showed that allied health staff did not maintain the improved attitude at the follow‐up conducted 4–6 weeks later. Subgroup analysis showed that allied health staff did not maintain the improved attitude at the follow‐up conducted 4–6 weeks later Conclusions Findings suggest that ‘Me first’ may be helpful in improving clinician attitudes and communication skills with PP s. Further research should examine whether PP s report higher levels of communication and decision making with clinicians who have attended training.
Paediatric Education, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Patient-Centered Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Child, Pediatrics
Paediatric Education, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Patient-Centered Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Child, Pediatrics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
