Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Soil Use and Managem...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Soil Use and Management
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Research on Quantitative Methods for Measuring the Spatial Distribution of Straw After Rotary Tillage in Straw Return

Authors: Jiangtao Qi; Zhiyuan Bao; Weirong Zhang; Hui Guo;

Research on Quantitative Methods for Measuring the Spatial Distribution of Straw After Rotary Tillage in Straw Return

Abstract

ABSTRACT Distribution of straw incorporation in soil is a key indicator of the effectiveness of straw return. Due to the complexity and time consumption of conventional methods, this study employed three image processing techniques—second‐order moments of grey‐scale histogram (HSM), Optimized Area‐weighted Uniformity Index (OAU)and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)—along with a custom‐designed soil stratified sampling tool. Straw samples were divided into 8 layers from top to bottom (0–15 cm depth), with 40 sampling points analyzed. The evaluation model for straw incorporation uniformity within each layer was established by using single image methods and dual‐image combination methods. Results showed that incorporated straw was predominantly concentrated in the 0–10 cm depth range, with straw content decreasing significantly with depth ( p < 0.05) and exhibiting a strong negative correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.86) with the coefficient of variation. The PCA method was insensitive to soil color variation. In typical straw distribution, the average relative error for PCA was 5.5%, compared to 11.5% for HSM and 11.25% for OAU. Dual‐image combination methods outperformed single image approaches, with the OAU‐PCA combination yielding the highest accuracy (coefficient of determination = 0.90, mean absolute error = 0.03). These findings provide a reliable, efficient tool for field evaluation of straw distribution uniformity, addressing the critical gap between laboratory research and field application. The proposed methodology offers significant potential for optimizing tillage implement design, improving straw decomposition modeling, and enhancing nutrient cycling in conservation tillage systems, particularly in cold regions with slower decomposition rates.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!