
doi: 10.1111/roiw.70017
ABSTRACTThe paper explores the relationship between intangibles, technological change, and multifactor productivity (MFP) in four countries: Finland, Denmark, Norway, and Slovenia, between 2007 and 2019. An innovative approach using linked employer–employee data is employed to measure firm‐level intangible assets within the areas of research and development (R&D), organizational capital (OC), and information and communication technology (ICT). Building on this, we introduce an Intangible‐Biased Technological Change (IBTC) approach that measures the effective use and quality of R&D and organizational capital work. The results show that both intangibles and industry‐specific IBTC contribute to higher MFP in the Nordic countries. IBTC is associated with growing productivity disparities among firms within the same industry. Nevertheless, we also find that R&D enhances absorptive capacity, leading to positive spillovers in inter‐industry relationships, and that R&D‐IBTC can also narrow differences in productivity between various industries.
organizational change, R&D, technological change, technological development, nematerialne naložbe, organizational structures, tehnološki razvoj, nematerialne naložbe, organizacijske strukture, productivity dispersion, intangible capital, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/658.152
organizational change, R&D, technological change, technological development, nematerialne naložbe, organizational structures, tehnološki razvoj, nematerialne naložbe, organizacijske strukture, productivity dispersion, intangible capital, info:eu-repo/classification/udc/658.152
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
