Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Restoration Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Restoration Ecology
Article . 2025
License: taverne
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
NIOZ Repository
Article . 2025
Data sources: NIOZ Repository
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Restoration Ecology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Assisting recolonization of near‐shore seagrasses

Authors: Eduardo G. Torres‐Conde; Mariana Alvarez‐Rocha; Tjisse van der Heide; Karin Didderen; Wouter Lengkeek; Brigitta I. van Tussenbroek;

Assisting recolonization of near‐shore seagrasses

Abstract

Natural recolonization of seagrasses may take decades after disturbances and is particularly challenging in near‐shore environments, where sediment mobility inhibits seagrass establishment. We assisted recolonization in fifteen 4x10 m unvegetated experimental plots in a Mexican Caribbean near‐shore fringe where the seagrasses had died due to massive inundations of holopelagic Sargassum species, and where a containment barrier was placed to avoid future inundations. The applied treatments were: artificial substrate (AS: 90 belowground, artificial, biodegradable, 15x15 cm‐sized substrates, cut from a 0.91 x 0.45m Biodegradable EcoSystem Engineering sheet), transplant (TR: 90 cores, 4.5 cm diameter, with Halodule wrightii), and control (C: no manipulation), each with five replicates. After 6 months, 63% of H. wrightii transplants survived, presenting mean rhizome extension of 7.6 cm, and H. wrightii from natural surrounding patches started to colonize the plots. After approximately 8 months, AS and TR plots already showed higher light conditions and lower fluctuations in sediment levels than the controls. After 14 months, the AS and TR plots reached higher mean (± SE) density (respectively, 4024 ± 620 and 3484 ± 360 shoots/m2) and cover (60.3 ± 3.85 and 53.7 ± 2.84 %), compared to the control plots (2043 ± 381 shoots/m2, 35.3 ± 5.7 % cover). Higher density of H. wrightii likely favored the natural establishment of Thalassia testudinum seedlings, with an average of 2.07 (± 0.15) and 1.87 (± 0.18) seedlings in AS and TR plots, respectively, compared to 0.48 (± 0.23) in the controls. Both techniques accelerated seagrass recolonization, but artificial substrates required less effort and avoided harvesting of donor meadows.

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

core transplants, Halodule wrightii, Thalassia testudinum, near-shore fringe, artificial substrates, sediment dynamics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities