
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13837
pmid: 33931867
AbstractIn an electrophysiological experiment, we investigated the effect of reward expectation on the localized attentional interference effect using a cue‐target paradigm, while event‐related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. A cue indicating the reward condition of each trial (incentive vs. non‐incentive) was followed by the presentation of a search array containing two target items. Participants were asked to decide whether the two shape singletons (two triangles, two rectangles, or one triangle and one rectangle) among a set of circles were the same shape. Moreover, we manipulated the distance between the two targets to be adjacent to each other (Separation 1) or further apart (Separation 3 and Separation 5). Behavioral results revealed a larger reward facilitation effect for the larger target separation conditions. The N2pc component locked to the target display exhibited an interaction between reward expectation and the distance between the two targets. For non‐incentive trials, the N2pc amplitude increased as the separation between the two targets increased; however, for incentive trials, the N2pc showed comparable amplitudes in the different target separation conditions. These results indicate that reward expectation regulated attentional focus to better resolve the competition between representation and selection of the two targets for acquiring possible reward outcomes.
Adult, Male, Motivation, Adolescent, Electroencephalography, Anticipation, Psychological, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reward, Humans, Attention, Female, Evoked Potentials, Psychomotor Performance
Adult, Male, Motivation, Adolescent, Electroencephalography, Anticipation, Psychological, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reward, Humans, Attention, Female, Evoked Potentials, Psychomotor Performance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
