Using the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) in human and nonhuman primate research
Copyright policy )Using the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) in human and nonhuman primate research
AbstractIn this article, we provide a commentary on Kozak and Cuthbert ()'s theoretical paper discussing the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative and on Latzman et al. (2016)'s empirical investigation of the RDoC negative valence systems domain in chimpanzees, conducted with experimental procedures across genetic, neurobiological, and behavioral levels of analysis. We discuss the pros and cons of the RDoC approach to research on mental illness as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of this approach in the chimpanzee study.
- University of Chicago United States
- Emory University United States
- University of Atlanta United States
Primates, Research Design, Mental Disorders, Animals, Humans, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Primates, Research Design, Mental Disorders, Animals, Humans, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).6 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!