
doi: 10.1111/psyg.12655
pmid: 33429465
BackgroundIt has been reported that delirium causes various problems. Many researchers have reported the risk factors associated with the onset of delirium; however, there are few reports focused on persistent delirium. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with persistent delirium.MethodsA total of 573 patients hospitalised in Nara Prefecture General Medical Centre from October 2014 through September 2017 who were referred to the psychiatry consultation service were included in this study. Persistent delirium was defined as delirium lasting for 14 days or more. A retrospective study was carried out based on the patients' records. The relationship between various background factors and persistent delirium was statistically analysed.ResultsOf the 573 hospitalised patients, 295 were diagnosed as having delirium. Forty‐six patients with persistent delirium and 181 patients with nonpersistent delirium were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that male gender, opioid analgesics use, non‐opioid analgesics use, and low serum sodium were significantly and independently associated with persistent delirium. Ramelteon or trazodone was used significantly more in persistent delirium, although each use was not significant.ConclusionThis is the first study to reveal that male gender and use of analgesics were associated with persistent delirium in general hospital. However, as this is a case–control study and may contain bias, future cohort studies and intervention studies are needed. It is also necessary to investigate the relevance of the ‘degree of pain’ behind the use of analgesics.
Male, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Delirium, Humans, Pain, Hospitals, General, Retrospective Studies
Male, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Delirium, Humans, Pain, Hospitals, General, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
