Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Plant Pathologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Plant Pathology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Dose Splitting Increases Selection for Both Target‐Site and Non‐Target‐Site Fungicide Resistance—A Modelling Analysis

Authors: Isabel Corkley; Alexey Mikaberidze; Neil Paveley; Frank van den Bosch; Michael W. Shaw; Alice E. Milne;

Dose Splitting Increases Selection for Both Target‐Site and Non‐Target‐Site Fungicide Resistance—A Modelling Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fungicide resistance management principles recommend that farmers avoid splitting the total dose applied of a fungicidal mode of action (MoA) across multiple applications per season (‘dose splitting’). However, dose splitting may sometimes be needed to make another proven resistance management tactic—application in mixture with a different MoA—practically achievable, especially in cases where there are limited MoAs available for disease control. Variable effects of dose splitting on selection for resistance have been observed in field experiments, and its effect on selection for partial resistance in fungal pathogens is not well studied. An improved understanding of whether the effect of dose splitting depends on fungicide properties and the type of fungicide resistance is required. We developed a compartmental epidemiological model of Septoria leaf blotch (STB) ( Zymoseptoria tritici ) to investigate the effect of dose splitting on selection for both complete and partial target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance. To solely measure the effects of dose splitting, we restricted the analysis to solo fungicide application (solo use is not recommended in practice). Our results show variable effects of dose splitting: in general, it increased the selection for both target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance. Within the range of dose–response parameters expected for commercial fungicides, dose splitting increased the selection most for partial resistance mechanisms that result in a reduction in fungicide efficacy at low fungicide concentrations but not at high concentrations. We predict that dose splitting of a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide (solo) will increase selection for target‐site and non‐target‐site resistance by between 20% and 35%, respectively.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

Quantitative resistance, Fungicide resistance management, Septoria tritici blotch, Epidemiological model, Partial resistance, Non-target-site resistance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid