
Abstract I argue that we can visually perceive others as seeing agents. I start by characterizing perceptual processes as those that are causally controlled by proximal stimuli. I then distinguish between various forms of visual perspective‐taking, before presenting evidence that most of them come in perceptual varieties. In doing so, I clarify and defend the view that some forms of visual perspective‐taking are “automatic”—a view that has been marshalled in support of dual‐process accounts of mindreading.
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Social Cognition, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Social Cognition, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
