
doi: 10.1111/ped.15616
pmid: 37795844
AbstractBackgroundHypoglycemia is a significant problem for all neonates and requires minimally invasive and reliable monitoring. The primary objective of this study was to verify the safety and accuracy of the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) of full‐term neonates using Freestyle Libre, a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) device.MethodsThe study was conducted on 20 neonates. Shortly after birth, we placed the FGM sensor on the outside of the neonates' thighs. We scanned the CGM values at 60, 120, 180, and 360 min after birth and simultaneously obtained blood glucose values with plantar capillaries by heel puncture. The neonates wore the sensors for up to 6 h and then they were removed.ResultsOf the 75 data points to be measured, 65 points (86.7%) were obtained by scan. There was no change in the sensor attachment site in 12 of 18 completed cases in this study but we observed slight induration in four cases (22.2%) and slight redness in one case (5.5%) at the sensor puncture site. A moderate correlation was observed between the CGM and blood glucose values. The CGM values tended to be low at 120, 180, and 360 min after birth, and tended to be high only at 60 min after birth.ConclusionsThe CGM device was safe to wear on the neonate and the CGM data correlated well with blood glucose levels. There was dissociation between CGM data and blood glucose levels in the acute period soon after birth when the blood glucose levels changed rapidly.
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Hypoglycemia
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Hypoglycemia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
