Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pediatrics Internati...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pediatrics International
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Optimal probe position for precordial Doppler ultrasound in children

Authors: Keisuke Nishida; Ayaka Omori; Taiki Kojima;

Optimal probe position for precordial Doppler ultrasound in children

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPrecordial Doppler ultrasound technology can be used to confirm correct peripheral intravenous access in children. Changes in precordial Doppler sound from the baseline after injecting normal saline are detected using a correct peripheral intravenous access. However, the location of the precordial Doppler probe has been inconsistent in previous studies. Our study aimed to determine whether the right or left parasternal border is the optimal location for precordial Doppler probe placement.MethodsThis single‐center, prospective interventional study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022 and included children aged 1–6 years. The Doppler probe was placed under general anesthesia at the most audible site on the right and left parasternal borders of patients. Baseline heartbeat was recorded by the Doppler for 10 s on the right and left parasternal borders. After randomizing the order of the recorded data, two blinded raters separately listened to the data and decided the audibility of the sounds.ResultsA total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study. The proportion of the audible baseline heartbeat was significantly higher on the left parasternal borders than on the right by both rater 1 (96.1%, 22.1%, p < 0.001) and rater 2 (96.1%, 27.3%, p < 0.001). Regarding inter‐rater reproducibility, Cohen's kappa statistics for the left and right parasternal borders were significant (0.65 and 0.79, both p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe baseline heartbeat was more audible on the left parasternal border than on the right parasternal border with acceptably high interrater reproducibility. This is inconsistent with the interpretations of previous reports.

Keywords

Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Prospective Studies, Child, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!