
doi: 10.1111/ped.15332
pmid: 36149761
AbstractBackgroundIn November 2011, rotavirus (RV) vaccine was launched in Japan as a voluntary vaccination to prevent RV‐associated gastroenterocolitis. We examined the characteristics of intussusception following RV vaccination in our two centers.MethodsWe investigated intussusception patients <16 years old from January 2006 to September 2020. Patients were categorized according to the period (before [Group A] or after the introduction of arbitrary RV vaccination [Group B]). The patient characteristics and treatment of intussusception were retrospectively investigated.ResultsDuring the study period, 560 patients (group A, n = 233; group B, n = 327) were identified. The distribution of patients who were 0–6 months old was not significantly different between the groups (group A, n = 12, 5.2%; group B, n = 18, 5.5%). Among these 18 patients in Group B, 7 were vaccinated against RV, and 10 were not. One patient was excluded due to incomplete data. On comparing patients with and without RV vaccination, the mean age at the onset of intussusception was 3.3 ± 0.4 versus 4.0 ± 0.3 months (P = 0.19), the mean interval from the onset to treatment was 7.5 ± 2.4 versus 16.0 ± 2.2 h (P = 0.03), the time of the contrast enema for treatment was 9.1 ± 3.3 versus 7.7 ± 2.8 min (P = 0.76), and the final pressure of the contrast enema was 92.5 ± 4.4 versus 92.2 ± 4.4 cmH2O (P = 0.97).ConclusionsArbitrary RV vaccination did not influence the age distribution of intussusception, and the interval from the onset to treatment was significantly shorter in the patients with RV vaccination than in those without it. Recognizing the presence of intussusception following RV vaccination enables accurate treatment.
Rotavirus, Adolescent, Vaccination, Infant, Newborn, Rotavirus Vaccines, Humans, Infant, Intussusception, Rotavirus Infections, Retrospective Studies
Rotavirus, Adolescent, Vaccination, Infant, Newborn, Rotavirus Vaccines, Humans, Infant, Intussusception, Rotavirus Infections, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
