
doi: 10.1111/ped.14459
pmid: 32894884
AbstractBackgroundVancomycin (VCM) is useful for treating methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In infants, calibrating the initial VCM dose is difficult, and many regimens have been proposed. For instance, our center uses the VCM regimen recommended for infants in the 2012–13 Nelson's Pediatric Antimicrobial Therapy. Nonetheless, our experience has shown that the initial VCM trough concentrations were frequently off target. We therefore analyzed the data on the initial VCM trough concentration in infant patients at our center.MethodsThe study subjects were inborn infants born between July 2014 and June 2019 who were given VCM at earlier than day 60 in the neonatal intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the initial VCM trough concentration. The patients were divided into three groups by VCM trough concentration: <10, 10–15, and >15 mg/L. We also estimated VCM trough concentration by one method using Monte Carlo simulation, based on Nelson regimen dosage.ResultsThirty‐three patients were analyzed. The number of patients with <10, 10–15, and >15 mg/L was 24, 4, and 5, respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between <10 versus 10–15 and 10–15 versus >15 mg/L. The numbers of patients with <10, 10–15, and >15 mg/L in the simulation were 26, 6, and 1, respectively.ConclusionsMost initial VCM trough concentrations were below the target. We could not find any significant clinical characteristics, which affected VCM trough concentration. Increasing the VCM dosage of the Nelson regimen with simulation should therefore be considered.
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Child, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Retrospective Studies
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Child, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
